Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43421 - 43430 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 43421 - 43430 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
placed in the record. We shall affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30771 - 2007-11-05
placed in the record. We shall affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30771 - 2007-11-05
State v. Craig A. Sommer
. The record of the sentencing establishes that the trial court carefully considered all the required criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
. The record of the sentencing establishes that the trial court carefully considered all the required criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia E. K.
in the dispositional orders is unsupported by the record. We reject Patricia’s arguments and affirm the orders. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
in the dispositional orders is unsupported by the record. We reject Patricia’s arguments and affirm the orders. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Here, the court stated on the record that it considered the statutory factors; it then read them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36670 - 2009-06-01
Here, the court stated on the record that it considered the statutory factors; it then read them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36670 - 2009-06-01
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
fails to properly exercise discretion, this court will ‘search the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102636 - 2013-10-07
fails to properly exercise discretion, this court will ‘search the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102636 - 2013-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
or oppressive and the evidence of record substantiates the decision.” State ex rel. Staples v. DHSS, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20
or oppressive and the evidence of record substantiates the decision.” State ex rel. Staples v. DHSS, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20
State v. Lorenzo Winford
solely on his own self-serving testimony, he claims that "[t]he record is devoid of evidence that proves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11881 - 2005-03-31
solely on his own self-serving testimony, he claims that "[t]he record is devoid of evidence that proves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment states that the motion is granted for the reasons stated on the record and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
judgment states that the motion is granted for the reasons stated on the record and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
State v. Izell W.
assault was not made part of the record until his post-adjudication motion, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7028 - 2008-04-20
assault was not made part of the record until his post-adjudication motion, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7028 - 2008-04-20