Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43421 - 43430 of 58546 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the pertinent law to whatever facts are established on summary judgment or at trial.5 ¶18 Johnson argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440656 - 2021-10-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. Following a preliminary hearing, the circuit court bound Rogstad over for trial. Rogstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144424 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Reginold B. Trussell
. Trussell claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
the trial judge finds them present.”). The circuit court must use a subjective standard to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
adjournments, Broadnax successfully delayed entering a plea or going to trial for more than two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98448 - 2014-09-15

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6207 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to and since the jury trial. Consequently, the court set the matter for a continued disposition hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15

Thomas Dale Bottomley v. Linda Lee Bottomley
of a divorce judgment is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10402 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
main issues as whether “the trial court violate[d] Bangert and create[d] a manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116663 - 2017-09-21