Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43421 - 43430 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 43421 - 43430 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 48.415(2); (6). ¶3 P.M.P. denied the allegations in the petition and requested a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625286 - 2023-02-23
. § 48.415(2); (6). ¶3 P.M.P. denied the allegations in the petition and requested a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625286 - 2023-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245614 - 2019-08-22
relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245614 - 2019-08-22
Al Belmore v. Department of Industry
) whether the trial court erred in deferring to DILHR's interpretation of the rule. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10368 - 2005-03-31
) whether the trial court erred in deferring to DILHR's interpretation of the rule. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10368 - 2005-03-31
Allan Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
with legal authority on point. The jury was the fact finder in this negligence trial and WEPCO has presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3112 - 2005-03-31
with legal authority on point. The jury was the fact finder in this negligence trial and WEPCO has presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3112 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
moved to suppress this evidence. The trial court denied the motion. At a separate plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
moved to suppress this evidence. The trial court denied the motion. At a separate plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he consume “no alcohol or illegal drugs” and that he “shall not commit any crime.”2 ¶4 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
that he consume “no alcohol or illegal drugs” and that he “shall not commit any crime.”2 ¶4 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
Certification
vacated Spaeth’s conviction and ordered a new trial due to prejudicial and extraneous information
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100088 - 2017-09-21
vacated Spaeth’s conviction and ordered a new trial due to prejudicial and extraneous information
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
improperly denied his post- trial motion for an in camera review of any records of the Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29511 - 2014-09-15
improperly denied his post- trial motion for an in camera review of any records of the Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29511 - 2014-09-15
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Richard W. Schlueter
grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5104 - 2005-03-31
grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5104 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a jury trial. The jury found Bailey guilty of possessing a firearm while a felon on May 29, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215691 - 2018-07-17
to a jury trial. The jury found Bailey guilty of possessing a firearm while a felon on May 29, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215691 - 2018-07-17