Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43431 - 43440 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43431 - 43440 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Elizabeth Batdorf. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239218 - 2019-04-24
, Elizabeth Batdorf. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239218 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
standards. She further contends that the trial judge was biased. Because the record fails to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16278 - 2017-09-21
standards. She further contends that the trial judge was biased. Because the record fails to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16278 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ventae Parrow
negotiation that dismissed an additional count of retail theft that was read into the record for sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
negotiation that dismissed an additional count of retail theft that was read into the record for sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record and her arguments are not supported by citations to legal authority. Her brief also omits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603649 - 2023-01-04
to the record and her arguments are not supported by citations to legal authority. Her brief also omits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603649 - 2023-01-04
[PDF]
State v. Darnell C. Stevens
: Based on an independent review of the record, we find no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24740 - 2017-09-21
: Based on an independent review of the record, we find no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24740 - 2017-09-21
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
the record fails to support her claims of error, we affirm the order. ¶2 The 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
the record fails to support her claims of error, we affirm the order. ¶2 The 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a response. Upon review of the memoranda, supplemental letters, and the record, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92656 - 2014-09-15
a response. Upon review of the memoranda, supplemental letters, and the record, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92656 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Next, we conclude that the record supports the circuit court’s discretionary decision to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59080 - 2011-01-19
Next, we conclude that the record supports the circuit court’s discretionary decision to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59080 - 2011-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of recorded jail phone calls into evidence; (4) DOC amended its witness list two days prior to the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30
of recorded jail phone calls into evidence; (4) DOC amended its witness list two days prior to the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30