Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43441 - 43450 of 83107 for case search.
Search results 43441 - 43450 of 83107 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
for parking violations, and notes that in several of them the cases were dismissed. He also complained about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36945 - 2009-06-29
for parking violations, and notes that in several of them the cases were dismissed. He also complained about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36945 - 2009-06-29
State v. Reginald Lamon McDaniel
was denied. The case was tried to a jury commencing October 3, 1994, after which McDaniel was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18077 - 2005-05-09
was denied. The case was tried to a jury commencing October 3, 1994, after which McDaniel was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18077 - 2005-05-09
State v. Frances Nienhardt
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kurt Gilkes
at 736-37, 239 N.W.2d at 71. What Schleiss and the other cases reveal is that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11646 - 2017-09-19
at 736-37, 239 N.W.2d at 71. What Schleiss and the other cases reveal is that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11646 - 2017-09-19
State v. James W. Breseman
, 1997, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13647 - 2005-03-31
, 1997, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13647 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
not be the sole determinant of probable cause in an operating while intoxicated case. But that is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
not be the sole determinant of probable cause in an operating while intoxicated case. But that is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case and frankly I think she is right. There is not a necessity defense. You’re still welcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
of this case and frankly I think she is right. There is not a necessity defense. You’re still welcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) and applied them to the circumstances of this case when it made its factual findings. Hying has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160055 - 2017-09-21
) and applied them to the circumstances of this case when it made its factual findings. Hying has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160055 - 2017-09-21
Robin A. Arnold v. John C. Robbins, Jr.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-0570 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10442 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-0570 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antione Hunter
injury or physical harm to any person or the property of any person.” The alleged victim in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4482 - 2017-09-19
injury or physical harm to any person or the property of any person.” The alleged victim in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4482 - 2017-09-19