Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43441 - 43450 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 43441 - 43450 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Gary L. Parson
could not credibly claim to be unaffected by these relationships.[1] At a minimum, an appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
could not credibly claim to be unaffected by these relationships.[1] At a minimum, an appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott Michael Harwood
that Paterson was a community caretaker case. Id. at 529. The State made no claim that the police had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6031 - 2005-03-31
that Paterson was a community caretaker case. Id. at 529. The State made no claim that the police had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6031 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
to this court, claiming the evidence should not have been excluded. We concluded that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
to this court, claiming the evidence should not have been excluded. We concluded that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10114 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the unanimity requirement to him in at least one of his prior cases. Moore further claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476526 - 2022-01-25
the unanimity requirement to him in at least one of his prior cases. Moore further claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476526 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed below, we reject Dawkins’s claims and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 10, 2017, paramedics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491659 - 2022-03-08
discussed below, we reject Dawkins’s claims and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 10, 2017, paramedics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491659 - 2022-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of ...
In order to prove an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must satisfy a two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16
In order to prove an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must satisfy a two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of law upon any claim or defense or upon any element or ground thereof.”); 805.15(1) (“A party may move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83529 - 2012-06-11
of law upon any claim or defense or upon any element or ground thereof.”); 805.15(1) (“A party may move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83529 - 2012-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
remand the case for a new trial. Friedman’s other claims of evidentiary error are resolved by our order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29122 - 2007-05-22
remand the case for a new trial. Friedman’s other claims of evidentiary error are resolved by our order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29122 - 2007-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
first claim, although the codefendants all participated in the same scheme, they were not similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
first claim, although the codefendants all participated in the same scheme, they were not similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
They 2 Cal subsequently filed an irrevocable disclaimer of “any and all interest, claim(s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143756 - 2017-09-21
They 2 Cal subsequently filed an irrevocable disclaimer of “any and all interest, claim(s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143756 - 2017-09-21