Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43451 - 43460 of 69007 for had.
Search results 43451 - 43460 of 69007 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Mitchell A. Johnson
as the arresting officers testified they had observed. After holding a Machner 1 hearing at which Johnson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19963 - 2017-09-21
as the arresting officers testified they had observed. After holding a Machner 1 hearing at which Johnson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19963 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, § 908.03(2). The circuit court identified five cases it had reviewed ahead of the hearing, noting it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24
, § 908.03(2). The circuit court identified five cases it had reviewed ahead of the hearing, noting it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not commit any traffic violations. Traffic was light at the time, however, and Meier had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484561 - 2022-02-15
did not commit any traffic violations. Traffic was light at the time, however, and Meier had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484561 - 2022-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
level to the medium level, while all other similarly situated prisoners had their security status raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91976 - 2013-03-20
level to the medium level, while all other similarly situated prisoners had their security status raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91976 - 2013-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the dismissal should instead be with prejudice because the statute of limitations had expired. The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98123 - 2013-06-12
that the dismissal should instead be with prejudice because the statute of limitations had expired. The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98123 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be with prejudice because the statute of limitations had expired. The primary question is whether an earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98123 - 2014-09-15
be with prejudice because the statute of limitations had expired. The primary question is whether an earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98123 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
. Taylor added that he had a defense in both cases based on his alcohol addiction. At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
. Taylor added that he had a defense in both cases based on his alcohol addiction. At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, Ellen,2 following a breakup several weeks prior. Mylonas had moved out of their apartment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873696 - 2024-11-13
, Ellen,2 following a breakup several weeks prior. Mylonas had moved out of their apartment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873696 - 2024-11-13
State v. Levi Booth
was visiting friends and relatives, discussion turned to possible retaliation against whomever had allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
was visiting friends and relatives, discussion turned to possible retaliation against whomever had allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
Andrew J. Peterson v. Andrew S. Peterson
on its face that he had no attorney-client relationship with MariLynn. A telephone conference took place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
on its face that he had no attorney-client relationship with MariLynn. A telephone conference took place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31