Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43451 - 43460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 43451 - 43460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
It is sufficient to note that “the eight-month deadline is not an inflexible rule that the trial courts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34232 - 2014-09-15
It is sufficient to note that “the eight-month deadline is not an inflexible rule that the trial courts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34232 - 2014-09-15
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6215 - 2005-03-31
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in counts five and ten and with armed robbery in count eleven. The matter proceeded to trial. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-15
in counts five and ten and with armed robbery in count eleven. The matter proceeded to trial. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-15
State v. James R. Boardman
. On the morning of trial, Boardman entered into an agreement with the State, whereby he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
. On the morning of trial, Boardman entered into an agreement with the State, whereby he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James J. Mischler
was not applicable to him was a due process violation. The trial court determined that Mischler was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12701 - 2017-09-21
was not applicable to him was a due process violation. The trial court determined that Mischler was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12701 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dolores J. Rindahl v. Ralph G. Rindahl
the trial court's finding, not for facts to support a finding the trial court could have made, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10709 - 2017-09-20
the trial court's finding, not for facts to support a finding the trial court could have made, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10709 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
shifted such that the party seeking preclusion had a lower burden of persuasion in the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19
shifted such that the party seeking preclusion had a lower burden of persuasion in the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Al Belmore v. Department of Industry
of Chapter 145 and § ILHR 81.10(6); and (2) whether the trial court erred in deferring to DILHR's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10368 - 2017-09-20
of Chapter 145 and § ILHR 81.10(6); and (2) whether the trial court erred in deferring to DILHR's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10368 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
of discretion. Sentencing is left to the discretion of the trial court, and appellate review is limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
of discretion. Sentencing is left to the discretion of the trial court, and appellate review is limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
CA Blank Order
would have attempted to make a counter-offer or gone to trial, but because the subsequent offer was made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103623 - 2013-10-27
would have attempted to make a counter-offer or gone to trial, but because the subsequent offer was made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103623 - 2013-10-27