Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43461 - 43470 of 83112 for case search.
Search results 43461 - 43470 of 83112 for case search.
State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
to the defendant but in fact prevented the State from making a stronger case against the defendant than it could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2406 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant but in fact prevented the State from making a stronger case against the defendant than it could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Dekker v. Dennis M. Wergin
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3258 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11692 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3258 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11692 - 2017-09-20
State v. Calvin E. Gibson
2000 WI App 207 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16073 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 207 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a set-off for the face value of a note was appropriate “[u]nder all the circumstances” in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251516 - 2019-12-19
that a set-off for the face value of a note was appropriate “[u]nder all the circumstances” in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251516 - 2019-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
), which held that application of the “best interests of the child” test was unconstitutional in a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36792 - 2009-06-15
), which held that application of the “best interests of the child” test was unconstitutional in a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36792 - 2009-06-15
State v. Vincent Konrad Knox
In November 2003, Knox filed a motion to sever the case against him from his eight co-defendants. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20880 - 2006-01-16
In November 2003, Knox filed a motion to sever the case against him from his eight co-defendants. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20880 - 2006-01-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cases on the court’s calendar had superiority due to pending speedy trial demands or age of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87247 - 2014-09-15
cases on the court’s calendar had superiority due to pending speedy trial demands or age of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87247 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case and frankly I think she is right. There is not a necessity defense. You’re still welcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
of this case and frankly I think she is right. There is not a necessity defense. You’re still welcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
Robert M. Fahser v. Wesley C. Hilgart
that the instruction was an incorrect statement of the law given the facts of this case and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3379 - 2017-09-19
that the instruction was an incorrect statement of the law given the facts of this case and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3379 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, such as the acts in the present case. Here, the exclusion does not distinguish between criminal acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377417 - 2021-06-15
, such as the acts in the present case. Here, the exclusion does not distinguish between criminal acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377417 - 2021-06-15