Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 62048 for child support.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 62048 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Aurora parties supported their judicial estoppel defense by pointing to Robinson’s bankruptcy filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
, the Aurora parties supported their judicial estoppel defense by pointing to Robinson’s bankruptcy filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“fair and just reasons” that are supported by evidence in the record. See State v. Shanks, 152 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240696 - 2019-05-10
“fair and just reasons” that are supported by evidence in the record. See State v. Shanks, 152 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240696 - 2019-05-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not repeat those theories or offer any support for them. No. 2017AP1276-CR 7 DNA isn’t
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212552 - 2018-05-07
not repeat those theories or offer any support for them. No. 2017AP1276-CR 7 DNA isn’t
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212552 - 2018-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
responsibility to file in the trial court every document from the prior proceeding that supported his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
responsibility to file in the trial court every document from the prior proceeding that supported his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that Dabney did not present any new factors supporting sentence modification. ¶2 Dabney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
determination that Dabney did not present any new factors supporting sentence modification. ¶2 Dabney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas Z. P.
, 675-76 (1984) (holding in the context of a waiver proceeding that where evidence is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4425 - 2005-03-31
, 675-76 (1984) (holding in the context of a waiver proceeding that where evidence is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4425 - 2005-03-31
Roger A. Praefke v. Sentry Insurance Company
and the lack of any case law to support such an argument. ¶13 First, the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7427 - 2005-03-31
and the lack of any case law to support such an argument. ¶13 First, the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7427 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
testified to; moreover, he does not append any affidavits from these witnesses to support his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
testified to; moreover, he does not append any affidavits from these witnesses to support his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
07AP2261 State v. Korry L. Ardell.doc
, there is nothing in the record to support this claim. ¶3 In response to his jury demand, a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31914 - 2008-02-26
, there is nothing in the record to support this claim. ¶3 In response to his jury demand, a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31914 - 2008-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
supported the stop. DISCUSSION ¶10 To perform an investigatory traffic stop, an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13
supported the stop. DISCUSSION ¶10 To perform an investigatory traffic stop, an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13