Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
and if it is in accordance with the facts on the record.” Id. We are compelled to conclude that Schmitz’s Quelle argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2014-10-23
and if it is in accordance with the facts on the record.” Id. We are compelled to conclude that Schmitz’s Quelle argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2014-10-23
Raymond M. Gregor v. Robert Paugels, Jr.
property to which Paugels held record title. See id. at 701, 580 N.W.2d at 358; see also Lindl v. Ozanne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14788 - 2005-03-31
property to which Paugels held record title. See id. at 701, 580 N.W.2d at 358; see also Lindl v. Ozanne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14788 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lorenzo Winford
solely on his own self-serving testimony, he claims that "[t]he record is devoid of evidence that proves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11881 - 2005-03-31
solely on his own self-serving testimony, he claims that "[t]he record is devoid of evidence that proves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment states that the motion is granted for the reasons stated on the record and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
judgment states that the motion is granted for the reasons stated on the record and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
State v. Izell W.
assault was not made part of the record until his post-adjudication motion, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7028 - 2008-04-20
assault was not made part of the record until his post-adjudication motion, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7028 - 2008-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
. The “‘A’ word,” therefore, had already been used in front of the jury. The record does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
. The “‘A’ word,” therefore, had already been used in front of the jury. The record does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
Local 1287 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
Van Ouse’s grievance, the record shows that the issue was discussed at a union meeting where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6414 - 2005-03-31
Van Ouse’s grievance, the record shows that the issue was discussed at a union meeting where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6414 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the entire record, including any postconviction proceedings and to the totality of the court’s remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26
to the entire record, including any postconviction proceedings and to the totality of the court’s remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
performance. The video of the victim’s interview was recorded a few months before the revocation hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125159 - 2014-10-22
performance. The video of the victim’s interview was recorded a few months before the revocation hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125159 - 2014-10-22
CA Blank Order
% restitution surcharge.[1] After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143245 - 2009-03-15
% restitution surcharge.[1] After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143245 - 2009-03-15