Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 69114 for he.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 69114 for he.
State v. Robert A. Allen
the right to argue that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. See Hatcher v. State, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5814 - 2005-03-31
the right to argue that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. See Hatcher v. State, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
explained why Leicher’s involvement in treatment provided insufficient assurance that he had fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36706 - 2014-09-15
explained why Leicher’s involvement in treatment provided insufficient assurance that he had fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36706 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
surcharge that was imposed when No. 2009AP2986-CR 2 he was sentenced in 2005.1 Citing State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61697 - 2014-09-15
surcharge that was imposed when No. 2009AP2986-CR 2 he was sentenced in 2005.1 Citing State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61697 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark S. Barrows
heading into the Town of Woodruff. At that time, he observed a vehicle driven by Barrows heading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11832 - 2005-03-31
heading into the Town of Woodruff. At that time, he observed a vehicle driven by Barrows heading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
him for $1,600. He argues the circuit court incorrectly interpreted the statute governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189363 - 2017-09-21
him for $1,600. He argues the circuit court incorrectly interpreted the statute governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189363 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2005-06).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42671 - 2009-10-26
. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2005-06).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42671 - 2009-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T.
petition was filed against Daniel on September 30, 2002, alleging he had engaged in one count of sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19
petition was filed against Daniel on September 30, 2002, alleging he had engaged in one count of sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jonathan R. Bristol
reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. He further contends that the marijuana discovered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16266 - 2005-03-31
reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. He further contends that the marijuana discovered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16266 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Croell
convicting him of operating while intoxicated, third offense. He argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7634 - 2005-03-31
convicting him of operating while intoxicated, third offense. He argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Wilkinson
No. 02-1206 2 (1999-2000). 1 He argues that one of the jurors should have been removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5226 - 2017-09-19
No. 02-1206 2 (1999-2000). 1 He argues that one of the jurors should have been removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5226 - 2017-09-19