Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 68259 for law.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 68259 for law.
State v. Charles G. Campbell
an issue of law which we review de novo). ¶5 At the suppression hearing, Ornelas testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law which we review de novo). ¶5 At the suppression hearing, Ornelas testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. Whether a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119964 - 2014-08-25
factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. Whether a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119964 - 2014-08-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
… was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28
… was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
version of WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1r) was an unconstitutional ex post facto law as applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585654 - 2022-11-01
version of WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1r) was an unconstitutional ex post facto law as applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585654 - 2022-11-01
State v. Jeremy A. Janz
a reasonable judge could reach and (b) consistent with applicable law, we will affirm the decision even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13927 - 2005-03-31
a reasonable judge could reach and (b) consistent with applicable law, we will affirm the decision even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13927 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 23
) there is no other adequate remedy at law. Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76951 - 2014-09-15
) there is no other adequate remedy at law. Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76951 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dante R. Voss v. David H. Schwarz
community-based treatment as an alternative to revocation. ¶4 The administrative law judge found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19335 - 2017-09-21
community-based treatment as an alternative to revocation. ¶4 The administrative law judge found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19335 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the facts as found is a question of law that we decide without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109597 - 2014-03-26
to the facts as found is a question of law that we decide without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109597 - 2014-03-26
State v. Teng Vang
. State, 92 Wis. 2d 372, 383, 284 N.W.2d 917 (1979) (“We know of no case law holding that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21
. State, 92 Wis. 2d 372, 383, 284 N.W.2d 917 (1979) (“We know of no case law holding that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21