Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 43471 - 43480 of 58546 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statute.[5] The motion was granted in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
of the statute.[5] The motion was granted in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
for her expenditure. ¶4 At trial, Ozers testified that the Department of Defense grant operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
for her expenditure. ¶4 At trial, Ozers testified that the Department of Defense grant operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
is Entitled to Judicial Substitution ¶11 The trial court ruled and the County now argues that Terrance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7644 - 2005-03-31
is Entitled to Judicial Substitution ¶11 The trial court ruled and the County now argues that Terrance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7644 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
-finding phase. The no-merit report next addresses whether Undray B.’s trial lawyer’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101885 - 2013-09-09
-finding phase. The no-merit report next addresses whether Undray B.’s trial lawyer’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101885 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the petition in September 2021. B.M. acknowledged that she had experienced a full TPR trial and disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
of the petition in September 2021. B.M. acknowledged that she had experienced a full TPR trial and disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
State v. Jeremiah C.
was June 26, 2002. Katie contested the petition; after a court trial on April 15, 2002, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31
was June 26, 2002. Katie contested the petition; after a court trial on April 15, 2002, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—effectively, a trial to the court—commenced on November 30, 2009. The circuit court concluded that Streeter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
—effectively, a trial to the court—commenced on November 30, 2009. The circuit court concluded that Streeter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James A. Kreutz
suspicion to stop Kreutz. When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a suppression motion, an appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15178 - 2017-09-21
suspicion to stop Kreutz. When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a suppression motion, an appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas D.
.”) Similarly, Douglas does not condemn as clearly erroneous the trial court’s implicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
.”) Similarly, Douglas does not condemn as clearly erroneous the trial court’s implicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21