Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4351 - 4360 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4351 - 4360 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
deteriorated and the parties separated. Santich was awarded sole legal custody of their son. Santich moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11669 - 2017-09-19
deteriorated and the parties separated. Santich was awarded sole legal custody of their son. Santich moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11669 - 2017-09-19
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
was awarded sole legal custody of their son. Santich moved to Wisconsin while McClellan remained in Nevada
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11669 - 2005-03-31
was awarded sole legal custody of their son. Santich moved to Wisconsin while McClellan remained in Nevada
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress statements; and (2) ruling that Lieske could not impeach his own witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636726 - 2023-03-23
motion to suppress statements; and (2) ruling that Lieske could not impeach his own witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636726 - 2023-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27605 - 2014-09-15
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arraignment and waiver of the preliminary hearing, Wortman filed a motion to suppress evidence, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416866 - 2021-09-01
arraignment and waiver of the preliminary hearing, Wortman filed a motion to suppress evidence, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416866 - 2021-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26
him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Stokes argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85767 - 2014-09-15
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Stokes argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85767 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Stokes argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2012-08-06
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Stokes argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2012-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 Before trial, Cooper unsuccessfully moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204950 - 2017-12-13
, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 Before trial, Cooper unsuccessfully moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204950 - 2017-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
) & 961.41(1m)(cm)1r (2011-12).[1] Dawson submits that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
) & 961.41(1m)(cm)1r (2011-12).[1] Dawson submits that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02