Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4351 - 4360 of 29915 for des.
Search results 4351 - 4360 of 29915 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Grant Loescher appeals a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Grant Loescher appeals a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
materially breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135168 - 2015-02-17
materially breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135168 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Kanekeo sought de novo review by the circuit court. The circuit court heard testimony from Petitioner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
, and Kanekeo sought de novo review by the circuit court. The circuit court heard testimony from Petitioner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The existence of a new factor presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203529 - 2017-11-28
. The existence of a new factor presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203529 - 2017-11-28
State v. Jesse R.J.
the circumstances of a case constitute good cause to grant a continuance is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances of a case constitute good cause to grant a continuance is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶4 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29885 - 2007-08-01
review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶4 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29885 - 2007-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
percent on the unpaid balance. Lovern sought de novo review of this order. ¶3 After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
percent on the unpaid balance. Lovern sought de novo review of this order. ¶3 After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
[PDF]
Patricia Marshall Scales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
¶4 We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16125 - 2017-09-21
¶4 We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16125 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jurgen Brinkman
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31