Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43501 - 43510 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 43501 - 43510 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Randall A. Tetzner
the conviction. None of Tetzner’s claims are meritorious. First, Tetzner has shown no Brady violation. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13498 - 2005-03-31
the conviction. None of Tetzner’s claims are meritorious. First, Tetzner has shown no Brady violation. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13498 - 2005-03-31
Paul Hammock v. Daniel L. Koderl
a reformation claim. We therefore affirm. The facts are undisputed. Koderl was driving a snowmobile when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13833 - 2005-03-31
a reformation claim. We therefore affirm. The facts are undisputed. Koderl was driving a snowmobile when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13833 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry P. Koenig v. John H. Ahrens
cannot stipulate to facts and then claim that they need additional evidence to No(s). 98-1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13911 - 2014-09-15
cannot stipulate to facts and then claim that they need additional evidence to No(s). 98-1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13911 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
suggests that this appeal is moot. Tammy L. C. claims that we should decide the merits anyway because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51929 - 2010-07-13
suggests that this appeal is moot. Tammy L. C. claims that we should decide the merits anyway because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51929 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County General Relief Agency
controversy exists. A justiciable controversy is one in which a claim of right is asserted against one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9377 - 2017-09-19
controversy exists. A justiciable controversy is one in which a claim of right is asserted against one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9377 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas E. Burrows
enticement. This in turn, he claims, made the jury’s verdicts inconsistent and repugnant: the jury first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15627 - 2005-03-31
enticement. This in turn, he claims, made the jury’s verdicts inconsistent and repugnant: the jury first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15627 - 2005-03-31
Ann E. Burton v. Michael S. Fish
of two years. He claims the order is invalid because he was given insufficient notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2007-07-25
of two years. He claims the order is invalid because he was given insufficient notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2007-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be that he does not owe the claimed amount of support because the arrearage was created by the actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838540 - 2024-08-15
to be that he does not owe the claimed amount of support because the arrearage was created by the actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838540 - 2024-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in which he claimed to be intoxicated. Pfaff entered into a plea agreement with the State under which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
in which he claimed to be intoxicated. Pfaff entered into a plea agreement with the State under which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to bar a claim that the defendant received an illegal sentence “would raise the specter of a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34574 - 2008-11-17
to bar a claim that the defendant received an illegal sentence “would raise the specter of a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34574 - 2008-11-17