Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43511 - 43520 of 52412 for legal separation.
Search results 43511 - 43520 of 52412 for legal separation.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a legal proceeding and then subsequently asserting an inconsistent position.” State v. Ryan, 2012 WI 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476884 - 2022-01-25
in a legal proceeding and then subsequently asserting an inconsistent position.” State v. Ryan, 2012 WI 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476884 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and responsibility for the shooting by describing it as an accident. The State contends that the legal premise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70792 - 2014-09-15
and responsibility for the shooting by describing it as an accident. The State contends that the legal premise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70792 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to apply a relevant statute or consider legally relevant factors, or has acted based upon mistaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44495 - 2009-12-09
failed to apply a relevant statute or consider legally relevant factors, or has acted based upon mistaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44495 - 2009-12-09
Patricia A. Charette v. State
“a legal question is intertwined with factual determinations or with value or policy determinations ¼.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8353 - 2005-03-31
“a legal question is intertwined with factual determinations or with value or policy determinations ¼.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶12 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶12 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the defense of legal justification if the conduct of a law enforcement officer causes the actor reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28030 - 2007-02-06
the defense of legal justification if the conduct of a law enforcement officer causes the actor reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28030 - 2007-02-06
State v. Eric P. Russell
decline to address issues that are inadequately briefed; arguments that are not supported by legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8409 - 2005-03-31
decline to address issues that are inadequately briefed; arguments that are not supported by legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8409 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury during her closing argument that there were legal reasons for not introducing the videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07
the jury during her closing argument that there were legal reasons for not introducing the videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the parties dispute whether the findings support the legal standard of reasonable suspicion. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
, the parties dispute whether the findings support the legal standard of reasonable suspicion. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the Commission’s legal conclusions. However, regardless what level of deference we apply, if any, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43890 - 2014-09-15
the Commission’s legal conclusions. However, regardless what level of deference we apply, if any, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43890 - 2014-09-15