Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43511 - 43520 of 50521 for our.
Search results 43511 - 43520 of 50521 for our.
[PDF]
NOTICE
We disagree. ¶11 Sentencing is within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47753 - 2014-09-15
We disagree. ¶11 Sentencing is within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47753 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rule Order
.2d 584 (Abrahamson, C.J., concurring). ¶8 The new procedure departs from our longstanding
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146023 - 2017-09-21
.2d 584 (Abrahamson, C.J., concurring). ¶8 The new procedure departs from our longstanding
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146023 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d at 223). ¶15 In Paegelow, an analogous case, our supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993056 - 2025-08-06
Wis. 2d at 223). ¶15 In Paegelow, an analogous case, our supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993056 - 2025-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, 202 Wis. 2d 150, 160, 549 N.W.2d 435 (1996). ¶23 Our power of discretionary reversal under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57439 - 2010-12-07
, 202 Wis. 2d 150, 160, 549 N.W.2d 435 (1996). ¶23 Our power of discretionary reversal under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57439 - 2010-12-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 697 N.W.2d 407. Our review of the unanimity of the jury verdict does not depend on what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656581 - 2023-05-16
, 697 N.W.2d 407. Our review of the unanimity of the jury verdict does not depend on what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656581 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing and relied on that misinterpretation. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220238 - 2018-10-03
at sentencing and relied on that misinterpretation. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220238 - 2018-10-03
[PDF]
Sauk County v. Robert M. Engelhardt
of a statute to undisputed facts is also a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Minuteman, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14476 - 2017-09-21
of a statute to undisputed facts is also a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Minuteman, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14476 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prison sentence instead of probation. Our difficulty in reconciling these two statements is heightened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77521 - 2014-09-15
a prison sentence instead of probation. Our difficulty in reconciling these two statements is heightened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77521 - 2014-09-15
Lincoln County v. Misty K.
theory establishing juvenile court jurisdiction under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. See id. at 300-01. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2005-03-31
theory establishing juvenile court jurisdiction under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. See id. at 300-01. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2098 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. In accordance with our authority to supervise the practice of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33407 - 2008-07-14
, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. In accordance with our authority to supervise the practice of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33407 - 2008-07-14