Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43531 - 43540 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43531 - 43540 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
Philip Anderson v. Judith Leamy
they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), Stats. We search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14536 - 2005-03-31
they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), Stats. We search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14536 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we concluded there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39496 - 2009-08-17
report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we concluded there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39496 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, No. 2021AP2082 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589696 - 2022-11-16
review of the briefs and record, No. 2021AP2082 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589696 - 2022-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
State v. Jean H.
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
caused by the St. Croix County warrant. ¶7 However, the record does not support Nitchals’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59565 - 2014-09-15
caused by the St. Croix County warrant. ¶7 However, the record does not support Nitchals’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59565 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Philip Anderson v. Judith Leamy
. This court defers to the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14536 - 2017-09-21
. This court defers to the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25