Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43531 - 43540 of 58483 for speedy trial.

[PDF] SCR CHAPTER 70
assistance in trial court administration with respect to budgeting, personnel, equipment and facilities
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221953 - 2018-10-10

[PDF] SCR CHAPTER 70
assistance in trial court administration with respect to budgeting, personnel, equipment and facilities
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267281 - 2020-07-02

State v. Yolanda M. Spears
in this case. I am comfortable¾even though we have not had an evidentiary hearing, we have not had a trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17217 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 50
. ¶9 On August 29, 2007, the trial court granted Lamar's motion to withdraw his guilty plea on Count
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Connie G. Powell v. Arlene M. Cooper
that in most cases it is better to have the trial court decide such a defense through a motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13482 - 2017-09-21

Connie G. Powell v. Arlene M. Cooper
. There is no indication that anyone asserted or even discussed liberty interests in the trial court. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Yolanda M. Spears
. I am comfortableeven though we have not had an evidentiary hearing, we have not had a trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17217 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. Mandelman
extensive experience preparing cases for trial, but had limited trial experience so his role in the new
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25168 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
battery as a habitual offender. ¶9 On August 29, 2007, the trial court granted Lamar's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66884 - 2011-06-28

County of Jefferson v. Christopher D. Renz
than the probable cause needed to bind a defendant over for trial after a preliminary hearing. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17328 - 2005-03-31