Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43541 - 43550 of 68360 for did.
Search results 43541 - 43550 of 68360 for did.
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
that the State did not sufficiently prove the repeat offender penalty enhancements relating to his misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2011-10-25
that the State did not sufficiently prove the repeat offender penalty enhancements relating to his misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2011-10-25
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
that the State did not sufficiently prove the repeat offender penalty enhancements relating to his misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2011-10-25
that the State did not sufficiently prove the repeat offender penalty enhancements relating to his misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2011-10-25
State v. Bruce Martin
postconviction motion. Martin claims that he did not affirmatively enter any guilty pleas and therefore his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11120 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Martin claims that he did not affirmatively enter any guilty pleas and therefore his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because Stephens concedes that he did not serve an authenticated summons along with his complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999354 - 2025-08-21
because Stephens concedes that he did not serve an authenticated summons along with his complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999354 - 2025-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence, which did not exceed the legal maximum. We note that the presentence investigation (PSI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988820 - 2025-07-29
sentence, which did not exceed the legal maximum. We note that the presentence investigation (PSI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988820 - 2025-07-29
Craig Langsdorf v. Michael Hoefferle
. First, Langsdorf waived the business record hearsay exception of § 908.03(6), Stats. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12384 - 2012-02-28
. First, Langsdorf waived the business record hearsay exception of § 908.03(6), Stats. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12384 - 2012-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Smith did not file a respondent’s brief. We nevertheless conclude that the circuit court order should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
, and Smith did not file a respondent’s brief. We nevertheless conclude that the circuit court order should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
State v. David W. Hoppe
Although the trial court did not cite any law or explain the significance of its rulings, its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
Although the trial court did not cite any law or explain the significance of its rulings, its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
State v. Thomas Faust
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11048 - 2009-07-13
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11048 - 2009-07-13
State v. Tarek Genena
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11049 - 2009-07-13
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11049 - 2009-07-13