Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43541 - 43550 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43541 - 43550 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
not electronically record the interviews. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31769 - 2014-09-15
not electronically record the interviews. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31769 - 2014-09-15
State v. John H. H., Jr.
that are unsupported by proper citation to legal and record authority. Because John H. H., Jr.’s briefs do not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
that are unsupported by proper citation to legal and record authority. Because John H. H., Jr.’s briefs do not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
[PDF]
Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Parts Distributing, Inc.
ruling is unclear from the appellate record, this court must reverse and remand the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10882 - 2017-09-20
ruling is unclear from the appellate record, this court must reverse and remand the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10882 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
both counsel’s report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
both counsel’s report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record, and in doing so presents us with new substantive facts presumably not presented to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208682 - 2018-02-21
of the record, and in doing so presents us with new substantive facts presumably not presented to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208682 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Debruin filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174404 - 2017-09-21
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Debruin filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174404 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1105286 - 2026-04-16
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1105286 - 2026-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
). The statute provides: “[A raze order] shall be served on the owner of record of the building that is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43612 - 2009-11-16
). The statute provides: “[A raze order] shall be served on the owner of record of the building that is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43612 - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
the case to trial. Regardless of what information was given to Tiggs, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24816 - 2017-09-21
the case to trial. Regardless of what information was given to Tiggs, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24816 - 2017-09-21