Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43571 - 43580 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel, the defendant must satisfy the two-prong test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814654 - 2024-06-18

COURT OF APPEALS
the deficient performance and prejudice prongs of the ineffective assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53325 - 2010-08-16

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
parental rights. See Christensen v. Schwartz, 198 Wis. 222, 223, 222 N.W. 231, 231 (1928). “The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15827 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
parental rights. See Christensen v. Schwartz, 198 Wis. 222, 223, 222 N.W. 231, 231 (1928). “The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15826 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
parental rights. See Christensen v. Schwartz, 198 Wis. 222, 223, 222 N.W. 231, 231 (1928). “The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15829 - 2017-09-21

State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
was not recorded. For a defendant to succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the two-pronged test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Curtis Brewer
, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05. When a defendant fails to prove either prong of the test, the reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7906 - 2017-09-19

State v. Johnathan Britt
), Stats. Under this test, we will reverse only where there is a reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8848 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
test go into motion.”). In addition, Blunt’s failure to preserve the testimony of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2010-01-19

[PDF] NOTICE
be drawn. State v. Routon, 2007 WI App 178, ¶17, 304 Wis. 2d 480, 736 N.W.2d 530. The test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35952 - 2014-09-15