Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 6986 for a u.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 6986 for a u.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings set forth in the Village’s closing trial brief under the heading “[u]ndisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110424 - 2017-09-21
findings set forth in the Village’s closing trial brief under the heading “[u]ndisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110424 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sinora Glenn v. Michael T. Plante, M.D.
. Robinson, 340 N.W.2d 236, 242 (Iowa 1983), the supreme court said: “‘[U]nlike factual testimony, expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5292 - 2017-09-19
. Robinson, 340 N.W.2d 236, 242 (Iowa 1983), the supreme court said: “‘[U]nlike factual testimony, expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5292 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and that “[u]nder the Tenth Judicial Administrative District Rules, [Attorney] Rickard could not sign pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96622 - 2013-05-12
and that “[u]nder the Tenth Judicial Administrative District Rules, [Attorney] Rickard could not sign pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96622 - 2013-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2016) (stating “[u]nder Faretta, … a defendant’s reason for choosing to represent himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186355 - 2017-09-21
. 2016) (stating “[u]nder Faretta, … a defendant’s reason for choosing to represent himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186355 - 2017-09-21
Rana R. Lofthus v. Paul Malcolm Lofthus
. § 767.325(1)(b)1.b: “[U]pon petition, motion or order to show cause by a party, a court may modify an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
. § 767.325(1)(b)1.b: “[U]pon petition, motion or order to show cause by a party, a court may modify an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
State v. Azis Kochiu
, Stats., requires the State to disclose certain evidence to a defendant “[u]pon demand.” Kochiu argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15217 - 2005-03-31
, Stats., requires the State to disclose certain evidence to a defendant “[u]pon demand.” Kochiu argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15217 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
unanimously concluded and directed that "[u]pon remand, the circuit court may not require production
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109582 - 2014-03-25
unanimously concluded and directed that "[u]pon remand, the circuit court may not require production
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109582 - 2014-03-25
Scott Alan Ludtke v. Department of Corrections
court held that “[u]pon revocation the remainder of the sentence is the entire sentence less time served
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10983 - 2005-03-31
court held that “[u]pon revocation the remainder of the sentence is the entire sentence less time served
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and “[u]ndue leniency in one case does not transform a reasonable punishment in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654260 - 2023-05-09
, and “[u]ndue leniency in one case does not transform a reasonable punishment in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654260 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
WI APP 92
approach.” “[U]nder a bilateral formulation, the No. 2008AP2664-CR 7 crime of conspiracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36384 - 2014-09-15
approach.” “[U]nder a bilateral formulation, the No. 2008AP2664-CR 7 crime of conspiracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36384 - 2014-09-15