Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 29769 for des.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 29769 for des.
Larry Swanson v. School District of Butternut
an issue of law we review de novo. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12556 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law we review de novo. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12556 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth M. W.
de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section 48.32(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9044 - 2005-03-31
de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section 48.32(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9044 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Walford
. § 343.305(4) and the analysis of Walford’s blood sample. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5701 - 2005-03-31
. § 343.305(4) and the analysis of Walford’s blood sample. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Kanekeo sought de novo review by the circuit court. The circuit court heard testimony from Petitioner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
, and Kanekeo sought de novo review by the circuit court. The circuit court heard testimony from Petitioner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Ball
is de novo. State v. Krajewski, 2002 WI 97, ¶17, 255 Wis. 2d 98, 648
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5790 - 2017-09-19
is de novo. State v. Krajewski, 2002 WI 97, ¶17, 255 Wis. 2d 98, 648
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5790 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶5 Plunkett contends that her statutory ineligibility for the Substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶5 Plunkett contends that her statutory ineligibility for the Substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
State v. Jonathan Liebzeit
: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Gordon Myse, Reserve Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Gordon Myse, Reserve Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jurgen Brinkman
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark E. Hanson
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25726 - 2006-07-04
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25726 - 2006-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35194 - 2009-01-14
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35194 - 2009-01-14