Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 38288 for ph d.

[PDF] Rule Order
return date. SECTION 2. Supreme Court Rules 72.01 (8) (a), (b), (c), and (d) are created to read
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834108 - 2024-07-31

[PDF] Rule Order
return date. SECTION 2. Supreme Court Rules 72.01 (8) (a), (b), (c), and (d) are created to read
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834108 - 2024-07-31

COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Charles A. Beer, Plaintiff-Appellant, Darin D. Toot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59866 - 2011-02-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
results.” See id. ¶7 Groce’s sentence is governed by WIS. STAT. §§ 939.62(1)(a) and 973.01(2)(b)-(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nikola P. Kostich
2005 WI 90 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2003AP2950-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18713 - 2005-06-23

Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
the court concluded that “[d]ismissal under [Wis. Stat.] § 802.05(3)(b)(4) … is appropriate because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
2014 WI 24 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP892-D & 2012AP1777-D Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112680 - 2014-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under s. 938.30(5)(c)1. or (d)1., a finding by the court exercising jurisdiction under chs. 48 and 938
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90674 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
Groce’s sentence is governed by Wis. Stat. §§ 939.62(1)(a) and 973.01(2)(b)-(d). Those statutes provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03

State v. Kenneth W. Mickelson
-trial. Wis. Stat. § 905.04(4)(d). As a result, he concludes the information received by the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2870 - 2005-03-31