Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 12873 for se.
Search results 4361 - 4370 of 12873 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS
: Elliott M. Levine, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Matthew Brakefield, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
: Elliott M. Levine, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Matthew Brakefield, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
pro se defense. This contention is almost specious. The record shows that the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31
pro se defense. This contention is almost specious. The record shows that the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Reyes
to “come on in,” not to enter the living room per se; and (4) consent to enter the living room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12611 - 2005-03-31
to “come on in,” not to enter the living room per se; and (4) consent to enter the living room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12611 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s failure to discuss possible defenses is “per se deficient.” However, his motion does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124663 - 2014-10-20
counsel’s failure to discuss possible defenses is “per se deficient.” However, his motion does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124663 - 2014-10-20
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
and Mason, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Taylor, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
and Mason, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Taylor, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. The dispositive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573218 - 2022-10-04
se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. The dispositive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573218 - 2022-10-04
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Sean Simpson
. Simpson, acting pro se, claims that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10658 - 2005-03-31
. Simpson, acting pro se, claims that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
to run concurrent with that sentence. Moskonas filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10768 - 2005-03-31
to run concurrent with that sentence. Moskonas filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10768 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
., and Hagedorn, J. Darren M. Wold appeals pro se from an order denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21
., and Hagedorn, J. Darren M. Wold appeals pro se from an order denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21