Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43601 - 43610 of 69415 for he.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a canine sniff and the deputy’s frisk was unlawful because he lacked reasonable suspicion that Brown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340556 - 2021-03-03

CA Blank Order
that he understood the information explained on that form, and is not now claiming otherwise. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146250 - 2015-08-11

State v. Donald J. Johnson
after he began to serve the original sentences violates his double jeopardy rights. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8844 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mardelle E. Triggs
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, he transported her to a local hospital. He read her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7534 - 2017-09-19

State v. Gary E. Waters
charges should not have been tried in Marathon County and that he is entitled to a sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5753 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
would lack arguable merit. In his response to the no-merit report, Langlois states he does “not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213012 - 2018-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of conviction for operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration, first offense. He challenges the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27565 - 2006-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2005-06).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42671 - 2009-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS
alleged that he was not given the presentence investigation report until the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29409 - 2007-06-18

[PDF] John M. O'Neill v. Indian Hills First Addition Association, Inc.
dismissing his complaint and deeming his action frivolous because he did not timely appeal from that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13270 - 2017-09-21