Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43611 - 43620 of 76980 for judgment for u s.
Search results 43611 - 43620 of 76980 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% Criminal 116 95 101 105 417 Percentage 50% 47% 47% 46% 47% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209245 - 2018-03-05
% Criminal 116 95 101 105 417 Percentage 50% 47% 47% 46% 47% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209245 - 2018-03-05
[PDF]
Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review thereof as provided in this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13154 - 2017-09-21
by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review thereof as provided in this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% Criminal 155 119 94 87 455 Percentage 50% 50% 37% 31% 42% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
% Criminal 155 119 94 87 455 Percentage 50% 50% 37% 31% 42% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
be reached “[r]egardless of time constraints for filing the mandamus for public records request[s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
be reached “[r]egardless of time constraints for filing the mandamus for public records request[s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
rights to Ermoney S., a person under the age of 18: State of Wisconsin v. Emmanuel C. (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98508 - 2014-09-15
rights to Ermoney S., a person under the age of 18: State of Wisconsin v. Emmanuel C. (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1990)). As our supreme court has explained: [S]uspicious conduct by its very nature is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15
(1990)). As our supreme court has explained: [S]uspicious conduct by its very nature is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15
Andre Wingo v. Randall R. Hepp
in the original postconviction motion and that “[s]uccessive motions and appeals, which all could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21139 - 2006-01-30
in the original postconviction motion and that “[s]uccessive motions and appeals, which all could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21139 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We disagree. ¶8 “[S]tatutory interpretation begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29409 - 2014-09-15
. We disagree. ¶8 “[S]tatutory interpretation begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% Criminal 155 119 94 87 455 Percentage 50% 50% 37% 31% 42% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
% Criminal 155 119 94 87 455 Percentage 50% 50% 37% 31% 42% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed Other 90% 7% 3% 86% 9% 5
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108645 - 2017-09-21
% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed Other 90% 7% 3% 86% 9% 5
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108645 - 2017-09-21