Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43611 - 43620 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 43611 - 43620 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Racine County v. James P. G.
on cross-examination. James’ trial attorney apparently could not understand how Dr. Callaghan could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19114 - 2017-09-21
on cross-examination. James’ trial attorney apparently could not understand how Dr. Callaghan could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Court in 2004, and after a court trial, judgment was entered in favor of PDQ. On appeal, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95539 - 2014-09-15
Court in 2004, and after a court trial, judgment was entered in favor of PDQ. On appeal, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95539 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreement, he pled guilty to the charge without the penalty enhancer. The trial court sentenced him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180524 - 2017-09-21
agreement, he pled guilty to the charge without the penalty enhancer. The trial court sentenced him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180524 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for evidence that supports findings the trial court made, not for findings it could have made but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
for evidence that supports findings the trial court made, not for findings it could have made but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s failure to call two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=874414 - 2024-11-12
order on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s failure to call two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=874414 - 2024-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
)(a). ¶3 Bond testified at the trial that he was standing outside of a club when he turned around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27
)(a). ¶3 Bond testified at the trial that he was standing outside of a club when he turned around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27
State v. William T. Anderson
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a).[1] Anderson contends the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a).[1] Anderson contends the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04
[PDF]
State v. Joel N. Nitka
the upbringing of a child. This constitutional challenge was not raised in the trial court. We deem the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
the upbringing of a child. This constitutional challenge was not raised in the trial court. We deem the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mequon Medical Associates v. S.T.O. Industries, Inc.
). The dispositive issue is whether the economic loss doctrine bars Mequon’s lawsuit. We agree with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5725 - 2017-09-19
). The dispositive issue is whether the economic loss doctrine bars Mequon’s lawsuit. We agree with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5725 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying her motion for a new trial. 2 She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102298 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying her motion for a new trial. 2 She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102298 - 2017-09-21