Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43641 - 43650 of 68246 for law.

[PDF] Suzanne Schuck v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
of contract interpretation and, therefore, a question of law that we review de novo. Williams v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8885 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Alfonzo T. Young
of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395 N.W.2d at 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas C. Grohmann
of fact on appeal, ... the question is one of law to be reviewed de novo without deference to the lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9143 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steven George Lillo
discretion or bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law. Id.; see also State v. Sorenson, 143 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14209 - 2014-09-15

Russell S. Gilson v. City of De Pere
as a matter of law. Id.; see also Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis.2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476-77 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14899 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
if the circuit court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and using a demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96371 - 2014-09-15

Thomas V. Rankin, M.D. v. Medical Examining Board
Following a hearing before an administrative law judge, the ALJ found: “Dr. Rankin’s conduct in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4850 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
conclude that we need not decide whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51331 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32773 - 2008-05-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facto laws since his sentence had already been served. ¶5 The circuit court responded to Poirier’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08