Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43651 - 43660 of 74790 for judgment for us.

COURT OF APPEALS
” because it was “too difficult” for his attorney to defend him. We summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48718 - 2010-04-05

2007 WI APP 136
, not Wisconsin, was the proper forum to adjudicate custody of her daughter. We agree, reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28799 - 2007-07-11

Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
consider the appraisal's reasonable costs and enter judgment if the DOT's payment was insufficient. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on a motion to suppress evidence using a two-step standard. State v. Lonkoski, 2013 WI 30, ¶21, 346 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
also observed some materials used to package cocaine. Susler and his partner then “froze” the scene
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189107 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
bodily harm. …. c. Evidences such impaired judgment, manifested by evidence of a pattern of recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104752 - 2013-11-25

[PDF] State v. Michael Cruz
- ineffective for failing to raise this issue in Cruz's appeal from the judgment of conviction. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment convicting him of one count of attempted second-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81178 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
that Meeks was: exceptionally able to communicate his version. I’m not saying he used big words or precise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28538 - 2007-03-26

[PDF] State v. Norman G.K.
, 677-78 (1979) (the trial court’s decision on a motion to reopen and reconsider a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14851 - 2017-09-21