Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43671 - 43680 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43671 - 43680 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as charged because his former counsel told him his record “didn’t look too bad” and he assumed counsel knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91837 - 2014-09-15
as charged because his former counsel told him his record “didn’t look too bad” and he assumed counsel knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91837 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
conclude that the no merit report accurately describes the record and correctly analyzes the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4188 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the no merit report accurately describes the record and correctly analyzes the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4188 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
conclude that the no merit report accurately describes the record and correctly analyzes the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the no merit report accurately describes the record and correctly analyzes the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
Patrick McDonough v. Alan J. Muetzelburg
argues, however, the record refutes the trial court’s assertion. Indeed, the defendants-respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14297 - 2005-03-31
argues, however, the record refutes the trial court’s assertion. Indeed, the defendants-respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14297 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we affirm the circuit court’s judgments and order. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2013-11-18
. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we affirm the circuit court’s judgments and order. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to 1 This court has listened to the recordings submitted into evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577798 - 2022-10-19
to 1 This court has listened to the recordings submitted into evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577798 - 2022-10-19
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
record, we conclude that Van Camp did not enter his plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. ¶17
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17095 - 2005-03-31
record, we conclude that Van Camp did not enter his plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. ¶17
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
record to preserve this claim. The defendant did not raise in his petition for review the issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17095 - 2017-09-21
record to preserve this claim. The defendant did not raise in his petition for review the issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
record to preserve this claim. The defendant did not raise in his petition for review the issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17119 - 2017-09-21
record to preserve this claim. The defendant did not raise in his petition for review the issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17119 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
record, we conclude that Van Camp did not enter his plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. ¶17
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17119 - 2005-03-31
record, we conclude that Van Camp did not enter his plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. ¶17
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17119 - 2005-03-31