Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43681 - 43690 of 84310 for case number.
Search results 43681 - 43690 of 84310 for case number.
State v. Randy L. Barreau
in this case. We held that the analysis set forth in State v. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d 529, 494 N.W.2d 399 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16242 - 2005-03-31
in this case. We held that the analysis set forth in State v. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d 529, 494 N.W.2d 399 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16242 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Frank
. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199, No. 99-1765-CR, we engaged in an analysis of the same issue raised in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199, No. 99-1765-CR, we engaged in an analysis of the same issue raised in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and that is why I went back there to try to find casings from the gun. [The State]: That was John Birt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71891 - 2014-09-15
; and that is why I went back there to try to find casings from the gun. [The State]: That was John Birt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71891 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95125 - 2013-04-03
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95125 - 2013-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS
was sought. We dismiss this appeal as moot. ΒΆ2 Appellate courts will generally not consider cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51929 - 2010-07-13
was sought. We dismiss this appeal as moot. ΒΆ2 Appellate courts will generally not consider cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51929 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
Harlan Richards v. Tommy Thompson
applied to him to his detriment in any prior or pending action.1 Essentially, Richards bases his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3331 - 2017-09-19
applied to him to his detriment in any prior or pending action.1 Essentially, Richards bases his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719228 - 2023-10-26
CA Blank Order
., and Reilly, J. Jasxbreen Massey appeals pro se from a circuit court order dismissing his case for failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106607 - 2014-01-14
., and Reilly, J. Jasxbreen Massey appeals pro se from a circuit court order dismissing his case for failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106607 - 2014-01-14
Michael S. Elkins v. Grace Brown
that was to be provided to Elkins in a pending federal case. The discovery material had been shipped to Elkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24563 - 2011-02-07
that was to be provided to Elkins in a pending federal case. The discovery material had been shipped to Elkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24563 - 2011-02-07