Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43681 - 43690 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
claims the court erred in concluding the County met its burden under WIS. STAT. § 51.61(1)(g)4.b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778265 - 2024-03-20

[PDF] Maurice Eleby v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
a claim. The commission concluded that proof of intent is required under a disparate treatment case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14048 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. App. 1991), the defendant claimed credit for time served in California while he was on Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28306 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
, he argues that the court erred when it denied his postconviction claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35418 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Melissa could preserve a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel and for related fact-finding on her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165125 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
rejected Attorney Davig Huesmann's claim that her trust account problems were due to poor record-keeping
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231224 - 2018-12-28

State v. Reuben G. May
not improperly touch the girls as they claimed. He stated that he occasionally would give Margaret a hug, “when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 28
his postconviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Jensen/Haseltine evidence ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35418 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
In addressing Koeppen’s unanimity claim, we engage in a two-step process. We must first determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21

Debra A. Voigt v. Daniel J. Voigt
-nine percent of his earning capacity. Finally, he claims that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14774 - 2005-03-31