Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4371 - 4380 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4371 - 4380 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Joseph Cammarata v. Pheasant Run Partnership
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5416 - 2017-09-19
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5416 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. W.
It is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
It is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2761 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2761 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Daniel V. v. Debie M.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9150 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9150 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark J. Nagel
and seizures is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis.2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13731 - 2005-03-31
and seizures is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis.2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13731 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan D. Thompson
reviews de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that no evidence exists to allow a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5686 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that no evidence exists to allow a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5686 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” See Pozo, 258 Wis. 2d 796, ¶6. ¶4 Arthur was convicted and is imprisoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35506 - 2009-02-09
that we review de novo.” See Pozo, 258 Wis. 2d 796, ¶6. ¶4 Arthur was convicted and is imprisoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35506 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant of the right to present a defense is a constitutional question which we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82611 - 2014-09-15
a defendant of the right to present a defense is a constitutional question which we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82611 - 2014-09-15
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
review prison disciplinary decisions de novo, and, consequently, any trial court errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15925 - 2005-03-31
review prison disciplinary decisions de novo, and, consequently, any trial court errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15925 - 2005-03-31