Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4371 - 4380 of 24751 for extending.
Search results 4371 - 4380 of 24751 for extending.
CA Blank Order
days. We received no response. On May 28, 2014, we sua sponte extended the time for Cierra M. to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132239 - 2014-12-22
days. We received no response. On May 28, 2014, we sua sponte extended the time for Cierra M. to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132239 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
WI App 39
of the Andersons’ extended family members also lived in Fairfield. ¶5 After Jeffery no longer worked at ATI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364474 - 2021-07-14
of the Andersons’ extended family members also lived in Fairfield. ¶5 After Jeffery no longer worked at ATI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364474 - 2021-07-14
State v. David S. Stenklyft
and five years extended supervision, for a total term of imprisonment of seven and one-half years
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18504 - 2005-06-08
and five years extended supervision, for a total term of imprisonment of seven and one-half years
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18504 - 2005-06-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
to recommend a six-year prison term, comprised of three-year periods of initial confinement and extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35637 - 2014-09-15
to recommend a six-year prison term, comprised of three-year periods of initial confinement and extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35637 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher M.
and his failure to comply with extended supervision. The court granted the motion over defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7368 - 2005-03-31
and his failure to comply with extended supervision. The court granted the motion over defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7368 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ extended supervision out of a maximum possible penalty of forty years. The court recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33924 - 2008-09-02
years’ extended supervision out of a maximum possible penalty of forty years. The court recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33924 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charges in a different case, remain silent as to his extended supervision eligibility date, and ask
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241684 - 2019-06-12
charges in a different case, remain silent as to his extended supervision eligibility date, and ask
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241684 - 2019-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. 3 See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690-91 (1984) (stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
of extended supervision. 3 See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690-91 (1984) (stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 244 (1976). ¶7 Satterfield claims that his mandatory release date was illegally extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29840 - 2007-07-30
N.W.2d 244 (1976). ¶7 Satterfield claims that his mandatory release date was illegally extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29840 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision, consecutive to the sentence imposed in the Michigan case resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23
’ extended supervision, consecutive to the sentence imposed in the Michigan case resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23