Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4371 - 4380 of 63537 for records.

[MS WORD] CA-150: Brief Cover
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30

[PDF] Brief Cover
§ 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised
/formdisplay/CA-150.pdf?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30

State v. Raymond Sykes, Jr.
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101801 - 2013-09-08

State v. Michael Davis
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9743 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Davis
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11

[PDF] State v. Byron D. Mitchell
the no merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11396 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to make a sufficient record detailing their reasons for the sentence imposed.” Id., 255 Wis. 2d 662
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71632 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26630 - 2006-10-02