Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43731 - 43740 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 43731 - 43740 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Wesley Michael Lund
¶6 We agree with the trial court that the blood test in this case did not meet the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7335 - 2017-09-20
¶6 We agree with the trial court that the blood test in this case did not meet the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7335 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Lynda D. Dahlke v. James S. Dahlke
2002 WI App 282 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4858 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 282 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4858 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the plea’s validity under the Bangert line of cases. B. Plea Withdrawal Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08
to a challenge to the plea’s validity under the Bangert line of cases. B. Plea Withdrawal Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
WI APP 95
2010 WI APP 95 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1924
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50839 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 95 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1924
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50839 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Haakenstad’s suppression motion and that, under the facts of this case, Haakenstad is not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138237 - 2015-03-23
Haakenstad’s suppression motion and that, under the facts of this case, Haakenstad is not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138237 - 2015-03-23
State v. Dennis E. Jones
allegation. However, the presentence report recites the case numbers in which Jones was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11775 - 2005-03-31
allegation. However, the presentence report recites the case numbers in which Jones was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11775 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
based on the facts of the particular case as they existed at the time of the conduct and determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50535 - 2010-06-01
based on the facts of the particular case as they existed at the time of the conduct and determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50535 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or not the defendant requested it or not, and I acknowledge that he did in this case, but I do not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104307 - 2017-09-21
or not the defendant requested it or not, and I acknowledge that he did in this case, but I do not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104307 - 2017-09-21
Gordon K. Aaron v. Byron Axel
entitled to actual costs and attorney fees associated with this appeal, we remand the case to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2343 - 2005-03-31
entitled to actual costs and attorney fees associated with this appeal, we remand the case to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by facts in the record and, therefore, is clearly erroneous.” Id., ¶29. ¶12 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346168 - 2021-05-06
by facts in the record and, therefore, is clearly erroneous.” Id., ¶29. ¶12 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346168 - 2021-05-06