Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43731 - 43740 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 43731 - 43740 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Victor T. Williams
was properly denied without a hearing.[3] ¶8 Williams next argues that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3421 - 2005-03-31
was properly denied without a hearing.[3] ¶8 Williams next argues that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3421 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
evidence that Flowers remains a sexually violent person, and (3) whether trial counsel was ineffective. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92657 - 2013-02-12
evidence that Flowers remains a sexually violent person, and (3) whether trial counsel was ineffective. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92657 - 2013-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
that there was sufficient evidence for the trial court to determine that the reassignment to Larry of over $434,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28071 - 2014-09-15
that there was sufficient evidence for the trial court to determine that the reassignment to Larry of over $434,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28071 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ryan A. Forman
counts of damage to property in an amount over $1000. A trial began and then a plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15846 - 2017-09-21
counts of damage to property in an amount over $1000. A trial began and then a plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waiving the right to trial by entering a guilty plea, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149613 - 2017-09-21
is knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waiving the right to trial by entering a guilty plea, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149613 - 2017-09-21
Dennis Taff v. Town of Burke
cross-motions for summary judgment in the trial court and that they agree that the material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4045 - 2005-03-31
cross-motions for summary judgment in the trial court and that they agree that the material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. §§ 346.02(1) and 340.01(22). A bench trial was held on September 25, 2015. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172701 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. §§ 346.02(1) and 340.01(22). A bench trial was held on September 25, 2015. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172701 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott D. Worsech
(1999-2000).[1] The trial court concluded that the facts set forth in the complaint were insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4853 - 2005-03-31
(1999-2000).[1] The trial court concluded that the facts set forth in the complaint were insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4853 - 2005-03-31
State v. Calvin C. Grays
was “no.” The court also noted that Grays was asked whether he understood he was giving up his right to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20313 - 2007-06-04
was “no.” The court also noted that Grays was asked whether he understood he was giving up his right to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20313 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when [this] letter … was read by the Court of Appeals and someone in the Trial Court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344044 - 2021-03-10
when [this] letter … was read by the Court of Appeals and someone in the Trial Court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344044 - 2021-03-10