Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43731 - 43740 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] NOTICE
that there was sufficient evidence for the trial court to determine that the reassignment to Larry of over $434,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28071 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, ¶5, 310 Wis. 2d 259, 750 N.W.2d 835 (a trial court should advise defendants of the effects of read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91451 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Mark J. Anderson
Anderson appeals his conviction for possession with intent to deliver THC. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13777 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
motion. The circuit court denied the motion and, following a trial to the court, Roehrig was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12235 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
“The writ of coram nobis is a common law remedy which empowers the trial court to correct its own record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20

Mid-Plains, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
53703 Hon. Richard J. Callaway, Trial Court Judge City-County Bldg. 210 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13788 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that encroaches on that land. They contend that the evidence they introduced at the bench trial on their claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31682 - 2008-01-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). 2 Attorney House also states that Bass believes his trial attorney was ineffective because she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157366 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waiving the right to trial by entering a guilty plea, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149613 - 2017-09-21

LeAnne Arbs v. Dianna D. Nelson
The construction of a will is a question of law we review without deference to the trial court. Furmanski v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5537 - 2005-03-31