Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43741 - 43750 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43741 - 43750 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reports, and following an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647477 - 2023-04-26
reports, and following an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647477 - 2023-04-26
[PDF]
Melvin R. Smith, Jr. v. Linda A. Smith
the trial court’s No. 03-2335 2 determination.1 Because the record demonstrates the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6826 - 2017-09-20
the trial court’s No. 03-2335 2 determination.1 Because the record demonstrates the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6826 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
issues decided by any court of record,” and he is “unaware of any evidence being properly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30124 - 2007-08-29
issues decided by any court of record,” and he is “unaware of any evidence being properly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30124 - 2007-08-29
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
the preliminary hearing as part of the refusal hearing record and indicated that it would use the transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5407 - 2005-03-31
the preliminary hearing as part of the refusal hearing record and indicated that it would use the transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record conclusively demonstrates that Packer was not entitled to withdraw his pleas. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
the record conclusively demonstrates that Packer was not entitled to withdraw his pleas. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the video was provided in court; no transcript of the video was in the record. Trial counsel confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324724 - 2021-01-20
of the video was provided in court; no transcript of the video was in the record. Trial counsel confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324724 - 2021-01-20
[MS WORD]
CA-150: Brief Cover
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Cook
and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10362 - 2017-09-20
and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10362 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11