Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43761 - 43770 of 82645 for case codes/1000.
Search results 43761 - 43770 of 82645 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charged with possession of methamphetamine in one case and with strangulation and suffocation, felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049954 - 2025-12-16
charged with possession of methamphetamine in one case and with strangulation and suffocation, felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049954 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing testimony from the social worker assigned to Lily’s case, the court found that the termination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655280 - 2023-05-16
hearing testimony from the social worker assigned to Lily’s case, the court found that the termination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655280 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
State v. Romel Anton Taylor
, 149 Wis.2d 207, 209, 441 N.W.2d 247, 248 (Ct. App. 1989). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10884 - 2005-03-31
, 149 Wis.2d 207, 209, 441 N.W.2d 247, 248 (Ct. App. 1989). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10884 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifton L. Watts
. The prosecution’s theory of the case was that the appellants fired a rifle into the Shipp residence. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
. The prosecution’s theory of the case was that the appellants fired a rifle into the Shipp residence. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
in temporary lockup be expunged from his prison record. Id. ¶6 While we recognize that in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
in temporary lockup be expunged from his prison record. Id. ¶6 While we recognize that in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
Daniel D. Drow v. David H. Schwarz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1867
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1867
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Gulley
. The prosecution’s theory of the case was that the appellants fired a rifle into the Shipp residence. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10535 - 2005-03-31
. The prosecution’s theory of the case was that the appellants fired a rifle into the Shipp residence. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10535 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Schultz v. City of Cumberland
of this case do not justify revocation of his license. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8426 - 2005-03-31
of this case do not justify revocation of his license. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8426 - 2005-03-31