Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43761 - 43770 of 44722 for part.

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Stynes
part: 939.62 Increased penalty for habitual criminality. (1) If the actor is a repeater
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16620 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recite” those mitigating factors as part of his sentencing argument. And, second, the court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251705 - 2019-12-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. This question is informed in large part by the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118785 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that “the interview [of Taylor] was conducted for the most part in a proper way.” Given these facts, a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55160 - 2010-10-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
alleged that Kriete had provided “commercial truck repair parts and service” to “William G. Wickman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076240 - 2026-02-10

[PDF] NOTICE
, the supervisor conceded that “Wood County did employ a part-time nurse who visited each Group Home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35670 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
in relevant part: I’m here as the victim in this case representing my two employees, which have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30168 - 2007-11-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, in pertinent part, that “[n]o statement, representation or warranty made by a person other than the insurer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25

State v. James L. Creamer
that needs to be discussed with the defendant and essentially in large part, if not totally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11430 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
, clearly showed on the top of the first page that it was intended to be part of the federal lawsuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32004 - 2008-03-03