Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43771 - 43780 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 43771 - 43780 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077586 - 2026-02-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077586 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] property.” Id. at 381. The court explained: We believe that the case law in Wisconsin clearly establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87320 - 2012-09-24
] property.” Id. at 381. The court explained: We believe that the case law in Wisconsin clearly establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87320 - 2012-09-24
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
that showed he truly understood his rights. However, he does not cite any case law, other than Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
that showed he truly understood his rights. However, he does not cite any case law, other than Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing factors and rationally explained their application to this case, emphasizing that bringing drugs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210047 - 2018-03-19
sentencing factors and rationally explained their application to this case, emphasizing that bringing drugs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210047 - 2018-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782997 - 2024-04-03
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782997 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
State v. James Martindale
case to case.” Id. The court went on: “In short, we require that the court, by reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21468 - 2017-09-21
case to case.” Id. The court went on: “In short, we require that the court, by reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21468 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
to limit the application of the re-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
to limit the application of the re-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT for a state highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111336 - 2014-04-30
This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT for a state highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111336 - 2014-04-30
Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
of the case. See MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. State, 203 Wis. 2d 392, 400, 553 N.W.2d 284 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2005-03-31
of the case. See MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. State, 203 Wis. 2d 392, 400, 553 N.W.2d 284 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2005-03-31