Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43771 - 43780 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 43771 - 43780 of 84312 for case number.
Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3620, 97-3626, 98-0092 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17336 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3620, 97-3626, 98-0092 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. In these two consolidated cases, Shane Robbins, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246958 - 2019-09-17
CURIAM. In these two consolidated cases, Shane Robbins, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246958 - 2019-09-17
Frank M. Kett v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3620, 97-3626, 98-0092 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17335 - 2008-07-29
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3620, 97-3626, 98-0092 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17335 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. ¶16 Goeben subsequently moved for reconsideration of the circuit court’s decision. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965297 - 2025-06-03
in this case. ¶16 Goeben subsequently moved for reconsideration of the circuit court’s decision. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965297 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
worker’s compensation benefits. No. 2015AP1961 2 conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177823 - 2017-09-21
worker’s compensation benefits. No. 2015AP1961 2 conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177823 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077586 - 2026-02-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077586 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] property.” Id. at 381. The court explained: We believe that the case law in Wisconsin clearly establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87320 - 2012-09-24
] property.” Id. at 381. The court explained: We believe that the case law in Wisconsin clearly establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87320 - 2012-09-24
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
that showed he truly understood his rights. However, he does not cite any case law, other than Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
that showed he truly understood his rights. However, he does not cite any case law, other than Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing factors and rationally explained their application to this case, emphasizing that bringing drugs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210047 - 2018-03-19
sentencing factors and rationally explained their application to this case, emphasizing that bringing drugs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210047 - 2018-03-19