Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4381 - 4390 of 29810 for des.
Search results 4381 - 4390 of 29810 for des.
Allen P. Tappa v. Gregory T. Barutha
not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. Id. Material questions of fact exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8375 - 2005-03-31
not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. Id. Material questions of fact exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8375 - 2005-03-31
Frankie Groenke v. Town of Pewaukee Police Department
judgment to the defendants. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4468 - 2005-03-31
judgment to the defendants. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4468 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
percent on the unpaid balance. Lovern sought de novo review of this order. ¶3 After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
percent on the unpaid balance. Lovern sought de novo review of this order. ¶3 After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
[PDF]
State v. Gregory T. Keiler
this standard is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 54. No. 00-1025-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2502 - 2017-09-19
this standard is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 54. No. 00-1025-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2502 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant of the right to present a defense is a constitutional question which we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82611 - 2014-09-15
a defendant of the right to present a defense is a constitutional question which we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82611 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Grant Loescher appeals a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Grant Loescher appeals a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶5 Plunkett contends that her statutory ineligibility for the Substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶5 Plunkett contends that her statutory ineligibility for the Substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. ¶4 Under WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172704 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. ¶4 Under WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frankie Groenke v. Town of Pewaukee Police Department
of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4468 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4468 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125616 - 2017-09-21
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125616 - 2017-09-21