Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4381 - 4390 of 72758 for we.

Certification
Higginbotham, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. We certify this appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court under Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37030 - 2009-07-01

[PDF] Alan W. Herzberg, Jr. v. Ford Motor Company
at the dealership 1 When referring to written correspondence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2596 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] In-Sink-Erator v. Department of Industry
. We hold that DIHLR's legal conclusion, that the notice was not in a conspicuous place where notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9118 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 144
. We conclude the circuit court properly awarded costs to the Estate pursuant to § 814.01(1) because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72535 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Oshkosh v. John Daggett
under the ordinance in several respects. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20856 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Appeal No. 2008AP755-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2007CF324
Before Higginbotham, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. We certify this appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37030 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Donald Mentzel
with sentence withheld. We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing Mentzel’s motion. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12661 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Acuity Mutual Insurance Company v. Miguel A. Olivas
these increased amounts, and Acuity sued. Acuity takes the position that we should treat this case like other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21163 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
failed to consider the relevant sentencing factors. For the reasons discussed below, we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613734 - 2023-01-24

State v. Renee L. Reek
that Reek had already received credit on a day-for-day basis. We agree with the trial court and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31