Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43801 - 43810 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 43801 - 43810 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
previous erroneous findings”; (2) “The GAL should have been dismissed from the case for his contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294571 - 2020-10-14
previous erroneous findings”; (2) “The GAL should have been dismissed from the case for his contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294571 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212916 - 2018-05-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212916 - 2018-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Gloria Mack
affirm. No. 96-1669-CR 2 The complaint in this case was filed by an assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
affirm. No. 96-1669-CR 2 The complaint in this case was filed by an assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Daniel D. Drow v. David H. Schwarz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1867 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12686 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1867 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dan E. Holman
, the “no contact” condition was reasonably necessary to protect a witness in the battery case—Packard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
, the “no contact” condition was reasonably necessary to protect a witness in the battery case—Packard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Christophel’s case to a single charge for $250.00. … Counsel, therefore, seeks to dismiss this no merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
. Christophel’s case to a single charge for $250.00. … Counsel, therefore, seeks to dismiss this no merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case. Hatfield alleged that a plea of guilty in this case could “have a more substantial impact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511951 - 2022-04-19
in this case. Hatfield alleged that a plea of guilty in this case could “have a more substantial impact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511951 - 2022-04-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133743 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133743 - 2017-09-21
State v. Reginald Young
of mental disease or defect. The issue in this case is whether the State can continue to hold an insanity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7703 - 2005-03-31
of mental disease or defect. The issue in this case is whether the State can continue to hold an insanity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7703 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135270 - 2015-02-16
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135270 - 2015-02-16