Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43811 - 43820 of 55711 for n y c.

CA Blank Order
to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94671 - 2013-03-25

City of Sheboygan v. Bradley R. Taylor
. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All other references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999-2000 version.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4781 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or communicate with the children, which is a defense to abandonment. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(1)(c
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208293 - 2018-02-14

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. § 752.31(2)(c) (2003-04). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27131 - 2006-11-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
disorder makes the person more likely than not to reoffend. See WIS. STAT. § 980.02(2)(a)1., (b), (c
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143835 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Scott C. Dunberg, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88245 - 2012-10-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
), 302.05(3)(c). Jefferson correctly notes that program eligibility is assessed using the same sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442363 - 2021-10-20

Bruce Lurye v. Gary Buchli
, or reversal of existing law. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c)2. He essentially disagrees with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15584 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104215 - 2013-11-12

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
for terminating Connie’s parental rights. The verdict was therefore proper under the statute. C. Best Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31