Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43821 - 43830 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 43821 - 43830 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the collective bargaining agreement apply, and it is undisputed that the District did not in this case invoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82296 - 2012-05-09
in the collective bargaining agreement apply, and it is undisputed that the District did not in this case invoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82296 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
so I popped her.’” ¶4 The case remained in a trial posture for more than a year. One week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
so I popped her.’” ¶4 The case remained in a trial posture for more than a year. One week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was dismissed. ¶13 In the case at hand, Atlantic moved to dismiss, but its motion was denied. Atlantic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106012 - 2017-09-21
was dismissed. ¶13 In the case at hand, Atlantic moved to dismiss, but its motion was denied. Atlantic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
, 847 (1990). We view the case from counsel's perspective at the time of trial, and the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
, 847 (1990). We view the case from counsel's perspective at the time of trial, and the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County v. Wade H.
.2d at 412. The court concluded that the statute violated due process because it precluded a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15819 - 2017-09-21
.2d at 412. The court concluded that the statute violated due process because it precluded a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15819 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 85
2015 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2014AP2376
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149566 - 2017-09-21
2015 WI APP 85 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2014AP2376
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149566 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, may not merely allege that postconviction counsel was ineffective but must “make the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140200 - 2015-04-20
, however, may not merely allege that postconviction counsel was ineffective but must “make the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140200 - 2015-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
was not the lynchpin of the State’s case. Instead, the important evidence was Mord’s testimony that he watched her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31634 - 2008-01-28
was not the lynchpin of the State’s case. Instead, the important evidence was Mord’s testimony that he watched her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31634 - 2008-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on February 6, 2018. After the case was transferred to Marathon County, Rader filed a “Notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259709 - 2020-05-12
on February 6, 2018. After the case was transferred to Marathon County, Rader filed a “Notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259709 - 2020-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case in which P.K.’s mother, S.K., pleaded no contest to failure to protect a child. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247873 - 2019-10-02
case in which P.K.’s mother, S.K., pleaded no contest to failure to protect a child. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247873 - 2019-10-02