Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43821 - 43830 of 84001 for simple case search.
Search results 43821 - 43830 of 84001 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
not seen this case before and is not privy to any of this record.” ¶3 The judge who resentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
not seen this case before and is not privy to any of this record.” ¶3 The judge who resentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were issued in Racine County Circuit Court case Nos. 2014CT727 and 2015CF428. ¶4 On June 13, 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259349 - 2020-05-06
were issued in Racine County Circuit Court case Nos. 2014CT727 and 2015CF428. ¶4 On June 13, 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259349 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1002909 - 2025-08-27
2 we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1002909 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
is unreasonable in the particular case.” The City insists that Lamar did not overcome the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27478 - 2014-09-15
is unreasonable in the particular case.” The City insists that Lamar did not overcome the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27478 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tracey Leon Wheeler
. 1987). The record in this case demonstrates that the trial court questioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11543 - 2005-03-31
. 1987). The record in this case demonstrates that the trial court questioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11543 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the judgment. Discussion ¶7 The circuit court concluded that Velez’s case could be denied for the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71349 - 2011-09-26
on the judgment. Discussion ¶7 The circuit court concluded that Velez’s case could be denied for the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71349 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Tyree Goodrich
. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 In Brown County Circuit Court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7316 - 2017-09-20
. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 In Brown County Circuit Court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7316 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James B.
and the public to hear the case” in juvenile court. James B. first argues that the juvenile court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9235 - 2017-09-19
and the public to hear the case” in juvenile court. James B. first argues that the juvenile court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9235 - 2017-09-19
State v. Crissy Marie Monchamp
of disorderly conduct. Specifically, she claims that the only evidence in the case was her statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18170 - 2005-05-16
of disorderly conduct. Specifically, she claims that the only evidence in the case was her statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18170 - 2005-05-16